Sounds good to me. I wonder how he feels about requiring NCPs to take drug test in order to have court ordered visitions?

I think if a history of use is present the it is appropriate, but mire so than that, I think that the cs receiving parent needs to provide receipts if doubt is cast on how cs is spent. Our Bm recieves cs, but does not have custody. (our state sucks). She complaines if we don't send stuff to her house for sd, she complained that she had to buy a pack of undies, she complained when cs was a few days late because her cell bill was late then.... It's hard to justify handing this stupid Bm our money when she uses it to get her hair, nails done... Pays her cell etc. We have texts backing up her pouts about her using it for personal use, but our cs worker said tough cookie we just had to suck it up and keep paying her. If the money benefited sd it wouldn't be a problem, but how does us paying a woman hundreds of dollars who sees her 2x a month benefit her? Would be nice in circumstances such as ours to ask where the money is going, and if she isn't using it to benefit sd then she should be cut off or reduced.

Well, I think aid recipients should be drug tested.
Personally, parents on drugs shouldn't have kids period... whether they are NCP or CP.

Taking the illegality out of the equation, let's replace drugs with alcohol and tobacco.
First, this is totally hypothetical for me, as my XH currently owes tens of thousands in CS.

Let's say:
I work.
XH pays CS.
We have two children.
I smoke a pack a day and drink expensive champagne. (or whatever...I don't drink much so I don't know a good example.)

XH gets all pissy. HOW DARE I spend CS on smokes and booze. How dare I get my nails done? My hair done? Etc.

Well, a damn good argument can be made that CS is spent on housing, food, clothing, assorted expenses for our children and MY income is used on booze and smokes. No? That's just how I see it.

I remember getting SO pissed that BM went and bought a new car while we struggled to make ends meet. I thought, well, of course she can afford a new car with all the CS she's getting from us.
Truth is, and now I'm more mature and can see it, that she worked. She received CS (as she should have) and she bought a new car. Could she have afforded it without CS? Probably not. But that would make the entire financial burden of a child hers and hers alone. We had three additional children and I was SAHM so we had the one income. Of course we couldn't afford a new car.

Then, when we COULD afford a new car, BM got all pissy and filed for an upward mod of CS. She lost.