You are here

UPDATE: SS11 and Pet Loss (Vent)

CastleJJ's picture

Sorry for the vent, but I am just baffled and a little pissed off. If you read my previous blog, you'll know that BM had to put down SS11's rabbit this week due to old age. SS is with us this week so it has been difficult to navigate that situation with the distance and allowing him to grieve and have proper closure. I think we have done a good job allowing SS to process his grief. We bought SS a memorial brick and mailed it to BMs. He got to pick it out and personalize it, which we feel gave him a sense of control in a powerless situation. We have talked to him and we told him, "if you want to talk about it, we will sit and talk about it for as long as you need. If you don't want to, that's okay to. We are going to take this grieving process however you need." We have checked in emotionally with SS regularly over the last few days, just to make sure he isn't burying his feelings. Honestly, I think this kid has grieved, accepted the loss, and is trying to move on. We have offered distraction, but he is also just back to his normal routine at our house and doing well. He is laughing and smiling despite everything going on. 

Yesterday, BM's GF texts DH to check in on SS. Of course, it's not BM checking in; she hasn't checked in since they were at the vet and SS said his goodbyes over Facetime. DH replied that SS was doing well and basically outlined everything we said above. GF then responded basically saying that it's nice that our visit is providing a distraction, but SS isn't feeling the full intensity of his grief here because the rabbit wasn't here and he won't truly react until he gets back with them and SS has to face the fact that the rabbit isn't there during his day-to-day life. She then went on about how her and BM are going to have to deal with the full emotional fallout, while we have only dealt with a small/fake portion of it. DH just responded saying "We will let you know if anything changes during the remainder of his visit." He ignored any additional texts from her. I told DH, I guarantee if the shoe was on the other foot and our dog died while SS was at BM's, they would dismiss it say "well he isn't really that sad because he was never really with you guys" and they would try to claim he wasn't bonded with our dog. 

I understand that SS may/will likely go through the grieving process again when he gets back to BM's since he will have to directly face the reality of the situation but I felt like this comment was really shitty. Yet again, it minimizes any effort we have put into this situation, which BM and GF ALWAYS DO! We are never as good of parents as them, we never deal with the same level of parenting as them, we never provide adequate support or encouragement compared to them, etc. We have this kid 6 weeks per year, which is BM's doing since she fought tooth and nail to keep this kid away from us as much as possible. Of course they are going to do more than we do, because they have him 85% of the time! But we don't do any less for SS than we would do for our DD. DH said that this is GF's insecurities showing and she has to feel "better" that us to feel stable in her SM position.

Plus, I have seen such resiliency in kids, not just SS, but kids in general. When tragic things happen, kids want routine and they want to grieve, process it, and move on. It is the purest form of emotion and it isn't riddled with all of the complex emotional bullshit that adults experience like regret, remorse, etc. I swear BM and GF want SS to sit and wollow in this experience for weeks because that is what they feel he should be doing; like that is what normal processing should look like. And it is likely how they want to process their own grief over the rabbit. Why can't we just be thrilled this kid is happy and doing well despite the circumstances? Why does he have to be an emotional wreck in order to be okay? 

This isn't the only hard life experience SS has been through and BM and GF have expected SS to grieve all these experiences to the fullest extent, despite the long term damage it may cause. SS, BM, and GF lost an adult family friend to cancer a few years back. SS was still struggling emotionally a year later, despite the fact that the kids of this deceased friend had already moved on. BM said "he is just sensitive and had a very close bond with this friend. It's normal to struggle this long after." I get that everyone grieves differently, but this kid was acting practically traumatized where the actual children who lost their Father were totally fine." And he is this way with every traumatic incident. He had had a full emotional breakdown in a restaurant parking lot over a distant "family member" (read friend of BM's) that died five years prior. Something triggered him and he just lost it. I swear, BM and GF want to examine every facet of SS' emotional capacity and if they feel he isn't coping "correctly," they try to realign it with what they feel is right. I just don't understand. I don't feel it is appropriate for SS to be feeling everything all the time. I feel like all of this needs to be handled in an age appropriate manner and in a way that helps him process and move on, not wollow in the past. We don't need SS having a full mental breakdown his senior year of HS over his pet rabbit dying when he was 11. 

Comments

notarelative's picture

What they wanted was SS being so emotionally distraught that he had to return to them early. They are upset that DH (and you) handled things well. 
Expect an email about how SS held his emotions inside and only released them when he returned to them.

CastleJJ's picture

Oh I'm sure. I'm not sure that they wanted him back early, but at the very least, they hoped he would be so distraught it ruined the visit. 

I doubt BM will email DH about it, although I've been wrong before. BM was only ever outward about her concerns/issues before court in 2019. That is when we used to get hundreds of abusive emails. Since court, BM has been radio silent on topics like this, only dealing with SS directly and keeping DH out of the loop. 

Ispofacto's picture

I wouldn't rule out the likelihood that they murdered the bunny to sabotage your parenting time.

 

CastleJJ's picture

I agree with this. BM told DH at the end of May that the bunny was declining and would likely need to be put down. SS went back to BM's the first week of June and has been week on/week off since. I don't know why she waited a full month to do this. You can't tell me the bunny was perfectly fine for the weeks SS was with BM. It is just likely she didn't want to deal with it when SS was with her or she wanted to mess with the parenting time so waited until he was here. 

Survivingstephell's picture

Well then, you could prepare him for dealing with grief when he gets back there.  You can reinforce his ability to handle it as he is older, a fact a life with pets, explaining that people handle grief differently and his way is ok and acceptable no matter what other people think.   I'd arm him with a healthy attitude about this.  Has DH ever talked about his experience of life with BM?  

CastleJJ's picture

There is no DH's life with BM. They dated on again/off again in high school, then did long distance for a bit during their freshman year of college, only visiting each other on weekends. BM got pregnant and broke up with DH the second she found out, then blocked all contact until SS was born. They never got back together and they barely communicated as coparents. For the last 6 years, BM, her GF and SS have lived out of state, keeping DH out of pretty much everything except our 6 weeks of visitation per year. 

We have prepared SS to understand that grieving looks different for everyone and it doesn't happen in a straight line. DH plans to talk to SS Saturday night about how hard it may be once he goes back to BM's and that he may grieve all over again. SS goes back to BM on Sunday. 

dragonfly878's picture

DH said that this is GF's insecurities showing and she has to feel "better" that us to feel stable in her SM position.

This. I couldn't agree more. If I were your DH I would make remarks like, "im happy and quite proud to be able to see my son handle this so well. I'll let you or his mom know if anything changes."

Placing emphasis on the "my son" part. 

notsurehowtodeal's picture

I'm starting to hate GF as much as I hate BM. There was no need for those texts. Good for DH that he answered once and then ignored her. You both have done a fantastic job of dealing with this which is evidenced by the way SS has reacted. I'm just sorry it had to impact your short visit with him. And yes, I find the timing of this very suspect.

justmakingthebest's picture

I am not one to minimize SM's or GF's in most instances but I would have probably told her she is overstepping. SS is with his father and will process just fine. If SS's actual mother is concerned, she can reach out. The end. 

advice.only2's picture

I wouldn't be surprised that GF is being BMs mouth piece, since BM knows DH won't engage with her. SS didn't act the way they wanted him to, sobbing, crying calling mommy every half hour on the hour.  I'm sure as soon as SS is firmly ensconced back in the maternal bossom they will pick at him until he breaks and bask in the glow of righteousness that SS is devestated. 

Rags's picture

fit that model.

Stay the course. Give SS the summer visitation to prepare for the shit storm of emotional manipulation that BM and  BMGF will put him through.

That these two bonded Harpees are hell bent on causing SS paid speaks volumes on how collectively they are are shit people.

Hopefully SS continues to gain clarity on them and on himself so he can protect himself from them and not live his life as a POS adult like his BM and her mate.

smh

Nea