Engagement ring
Forums:
How about this *new* and *stupid* thing that is bothering me...
DH gave BM an engagement ring years ago... and he told me that BM is planning on giving SD5 that ring (in the future).
ughh... is it me, or that's kinda tacky and annoying... so SD is going to be walking around with the ring that MY husband gave HER mom, isn't that a reminder of what they "once had" ?
What do you think?
G
G
Hopefully
she will lose it!
That is weird....but thats a
That is weird....but thats a LONG way off and I'm sure by then she'll have pawned it or lost it! She's probably just trying to annoy you by saying that! If you think about it, its kinda funny to give your daughter a jinxed ring! Obviously the marriage didn't last!
"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much fraternizing with the enemy"
It wasn't even a marriage...
They didn't get past through the "engagement" stage... which is WORSE... why would she give her that ring? anyway...
And no, she did not say that to bother me, she said that when they first broke up and Iwasn't in the picture...
Which of course, makes me look like I'm the psycho... and I have started to think that I'm really loosing it!...
Well then at the time she
Well then at the time she probably just had unresolved emotions. Buts it a long way off and I doubt in 15 yrs she will still have the ring. I read your other post too. You need to really try to figure out what it is you're trying to accomplish in knowing every little detail about her! What do you think you gain with ths knowledge, besides misery? Are you just adamant about making sure every aspect of your relationship is better than her's was? Why do YOU think you want to know everything?
"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much fraternizing with the enemy"
:(
It bothers me, I know I'm the one who is wrong. But I really don't know how to stop it...
I know in theory, I must not pay attention to that, and focus on my great marriage and family, but in practice this is so hard to accomplish....
I wouldn't say you're in the
I wouldn't say you're in the "wrong" There's really no right or wrong about it, its just how you feel. But you need to figure out WHY if you're ever going to figure out how to stop! You're not the only one that feels this way, I can think of another girl that has posted about this too. I think her issue was she was afraid if she didn't prove she was better for her DH then he might go back to BM. So you really need to figure out why YOU feel the way you do so you can try to address it!
"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much fraternizing with the enemy"
Don't worry
If it is a nice ring I doubt she will go that long without using it, and will hopefully have it re-set. Not to mention depending on why they broke up, she probably should have returned the ring to DH.
I would not spend one minute worrying about SD wearing it one day and the only thing it symbolizes is a failed relationship - not some holy relic!!
I would not even worry about wanting to know all this stuff. This is the kind of thing you do until you know everything, then you don't ever think about it again. I went through something similar and I guess it really was just competition on my part, wanting to beat her and I guess I did (to my mind, which had to go through all these same things too, years ago). It doesn't last long.
I would try to tone it down though, because if BM ever did hear about you being so interested, she would think she is just that great, all over again.!!
"A lie told often enough becomes the truth." - Vladimir Lenin
diamond
I've kept my wedding band from my first marriage (I helped pay for the damn thing) but I've kept it ONLY because it's a carat marquise diamond and when my daughter turns sweet 16 I'm going to have it put into a necklace pendant for her. I haven't thought of it as being tacky or innappropriate?
To clarify
I think it is different when you actually did get married and had a family together, that is what makes it an heirloom IMO. I think in that case your daughter will be thrilled and proud to wear it.
I had just always understood if the man broke the engagement, maybe the ring was a gift IF he could swing it financially, but ideally the right thing to do is return the ring. If I paid any amount of it that thing is mine!! LOL
"A lie told often enough becomes the truth." - Vladimir Lenin
Kaff! Are you my XW? ;) The ring sounds suspiciously familiar.
She kept the rings I gave her and she divorced me while having an adulterous relationship with her second husband. And she still wears the diamond and wedding ring I gave her.
Best regards,
Yes, that IS tacky.The
Yes, that IS tacky.
The mother of the bride is to give the daughter the ring only if: she and biodad are still married OR bio dad has passed away while they were married.
NOT if bio dad is happily married.
Otherwise, the ring is cursed (metaphorically speaking) and why would she want that on her daughter? She doesn't. Troll!! (Her, not you.)
That is wrong, gross and way too rude to you.
And why does she have the ring? The classy thing to do when a relationship ends is to offer the ring to the man who bought it. And let him pawn it and use the money to pay the ridicious child support, lawyer fees and alimony.
Why is it the exs think we're at war and they have the right to spit on us when we're taking care of THEIR children while they get time off?
I have had it with this below stray dog treatment!
Hmmm let's see
With the engagement broken off I am inclined to agree with Dannyelle that it should have been returned UNLESS the man broke it off in which case it is the woman's to do what she will. Read that in some etiquette book simple solution.
Doesn't matter if they were ever married or not. The ring was a part of the parent's HISTORY. I would be mad if BM still wore the ring because it no longer symbolizes what it was intended to symbolize obviously. The ring itself was a promise for the future. Well that future was over a LONG time ago and won't be back since he is now married to someone else.
Giving the ring to SD is crazy EXCEPT if she were planning to use the stone for something more. Like Kaffca my BFF who died kept her wedding rings. She too had a decent sized center stone with smaller stones on the side. She was planning to turn the smaller stones into earrings for their BD and the bigger stone into a pendant on a chain. BFF could have pawned the rings, but she felt that they would have meant more to BD and I agree. I don't just agree because they were married. I agree because it was her family's HISTORY. As much as we would rather it not all BMs are just an accidental lay. This guy was planning a future with this woman. They shared a kid. Things didn't pan out, but when SD is older those rings WILL mean something to her. Why? Because her dad bought them for her mom at a time when he DID love her. She probably endures a time and a future where DH doesn't even LIKE BM so those rings do hold a special memory whether SD was there or not.
I am not saying this to be unpopular I really can see the reasons WHY. Now I'm not saying that is BMs reasoning, I just see the other side. Place yourself in BMs shoes. You were the ex who has a daughter and the rings. What would you do? Each person is different. But just because it is not something that you would do don't let it get you all stressed out because you don't agree with it. Maybe you don't agree with it because it is BM and YOUR DH bought the rings. Chalk it up to it was before your time. You had no control over it and the rings now belong to her. Again you have no control over what she chooses to do with them. Honey SD is 5. You are stressing about something that may NEVER see fruition for a variety of reasons, but again...even if it did you can't change the outcome. You have a minimum of another 12 years to stress about crap that the BM will say and do that will make absolutely NO SENSE in a sane world. THis one just ain't worth it.
Anyone can take the easy way out and blame others. BUT it takes a a person of character to take a look at one's self and actions and own responsibility for their part. ~ ME ~ }:-P
Well..
According to my husband the ring was nothing special, and relatively cheap. So there aren't many things that you can get out of it, and her words were "I'll let SD have it" not "I'll convert it into something" she is not that creative anyway.
I understand and agree with the whole "family history" but they didn't really have a "family history", never got married and split up when SD was 20 months...
He tells me he bought that ring because she wanted to get married and was insisting on him to do it, and he didn't want to get married, that is why they never got married, he didn't love her, and he stayed with her for "sake of the child" which is B.S, but anyway.
I definitely agree that I don't even know if at this point the ring even exists (because she said that when they broke up which was like 3 years ago), and if the ring still exists then it won't be until many years from now that it will be 'used'"
Gia
Honey you are spending entirely too much energy on nothing.
Whether DH and BM married or not they still had HISTORY. Since SD was born of that relationship it is her FAMILY. If SD had to do a geneaology report it would descend from DH and BM. That makes them family. Maybe not in the sense that we define family and maybe not for a long period of time and maybe DHs heart wasn't really into it BUT none of that changes anything. It is still SDs FAMILY.
My DH married BM almost under the same guise. BM got pregnant and had a baby. That baby died. Things were not good for them then, but DH trying to be a MAN and do the responsible thing stuck it out to be sure that she was okay. He could have been an a$$ and said Whew glad I'm off the hook now I can leave. But no he did the responsible thing and stayed around to help her through even though he wanted O-U-T. Shortly thereafter BM was pregnant again. They had the baby and fortunately she was healthy and that baby is SD13. At this point things were pretty whack and DH wanted to leave, but he did not want to leave his kid. When he started addressing his unhappiness to BM she conveniently wound up pregnant AGAIN. BM went a step further and said you will marry me or I will take the kids and disappear and you won't see them. :O No way to start a marriage. Seems like it was doomed from the onset. BUT what did DH do? He manned up and figured for the sake of his kids that he was going to give his every effort at being a family. They were in splitsville before SS12 was even a 1.5 years old. It was a crazy marriage from start to finish. DH admits that he should have NEVER conceded to the blackmail of marriage BUT I would not have been able to respect him as a man had he just walked away. He owned just as much responsiblity in making those babies as she did. And if he really was ready to leave and wanted out then he would have made damn sure that he did everything possible to not continue knocking her up. So my DH probably loved BM at some point but by the time the kids came along that relationship was on its last leg. Trust me...my DH despises BM now. But I don't question for one minute that there was nothing there at some point. I will also be the first to admit that it is disheartening to think that he could love such a person but I am inclined to believe that BM was a different person before all of the ugly stuff.
The point is...It really shouldn't matter if the ring cost $400 or $4000. It shouldn't matter if DH felt pressured to stay for the sake of the kid. It shouldn't matter that kids will color and paint Easter Eggs this Sunday. It shouldn't matter that BM has something that she wants to share with her kid. That my friend is all that I'm trying to say. Stick around long enough and you will one day beg for this ring incident to be your biggest frustration.
Anyone can take the easy way out and blame others. BUT it takes a a person of character to take a look at one's self and actions and own responsibility for their part. ~ ME ~ }:-P
Oh, I don't know. My M-I-L gave my wife the wedding set that
my wife's bio Dad gave her when they married. But, the situation was a bit different. Wife's BioDad was killed in a car accident when M-I-L was 2mos pregnant with my wife.
I think that the rings are something from the Dad and not so much the BM in the case that initiated this thread. since there is no "Mom and Dad" the meaning of the ring may be important to SD when she is older.
I think Princ said everything I would say about this and Soooooo much better than I would say it.
Best regards,
Maybe I'm not that sentimental
It's only a ring. SD is only 5. By the time she's old enough for it to "mean anything" the ring could be LONG GONE! Or the BM could change her her mind- or hock it, for that matter, if she needs the cash
I saved my engagement ring from my first marriage, which lasted 10 years. It wasn't a good marriage by any stretch of the imagination, but it did give me my two BSs (19 and 15). I plan on giving my ring to my BS15 one day. The stone is pretty nice and he can have it reset for his future wife one day if he chooses (hey- why not save some money if he can?) I'm not being sentimental- just practical!
"Of course things worked out nicely for Carol Brady...she had a live-in maid and Mike's first wife was DEAD!"
When they broke up
I guess he asked what were they going to do with that ring, and she said that she was going to give that to SD, that's why he didn't ask for it back, and he told me he didn't pay a whole lot (under 400). Maybe she already sold it, she is broke as hell. Or maybe she will sell it by the time SD5 is able to use it.
If I were him I would have told her to sell it and use it to pay the debt (she owes him over $4,000 that she is supposed to be paying monthly, but hasn't in over a year)
When she mentioned that she was going to give SD5 the ring I wasn't in the picture, so is not like she was trying to make me jealous or uncomfortable. BUT if that ring DOES enter my house in the future... hmmmm... I don't know what I'd do, well.... I'll think about it THEN... but I just don't see why would she give her daughter the ring of a broken promise like you guys said, I agree.
It is definitely something I should not be worriyng about right now.
My husband
Gave BM the engagement ring she gave him for there 1st son I thought it was bullshit
on topic
question was ? how often husband talks to kids birthmother...
not at all.
He used to because she would call and say CALL ME and he was thinking it was about the kids, and she would start to complain to him or tell him what a loser he was, so he stopped calling her back.
If there is an emergency, she will say why he should call her back.
In the last 2 years, she has called many times saying CALL me on his voice mail and he has stopped returning her calls, as time goes on, she calls less and less because ALL her calls were total BS. She even called child support office and reported him
for not paying his child support,
when in fact he was.
Now, even the child support office has stopped replying to her.
Only 3 more years and
he is done with her....
She has called me on my phone several times and I filed a police report for harassment and changed my number, she has not bothered me since.
hmmmm no...
That wasn't the main question, hehe.
to be honest
the ring would not bother me.
I am all for recycling old jewelry. If she likes it, then its all that matters as she is going to be the one wearing it.
You may want to mention to sd she can have the stone put in a new setting as she may not like the setting. You can offer to buy her a new gold setting to put the stone in....
That would tick her mom off too... lol
Well....
My mom gave me her rings after my parents split up. I never told my dad.... and I don't think she did either. But even at that I think I would rather the BM give them to a child, rather than WEAR them or something. I don't really see anything wrong with it. I think to an extent it is important for kids to know that their BIO parents did at one time care about each other enough to marry and have kids. I think it is important to a persons self esteem to KNOW that they were not the cause of a divorce, that their parents didn't hate each other and they were not an accident or something that is a regret.
I just put my moms rings in my jewlery box and rarely even think twice about them.
As for ME, I pawned my ring from my ex and went to Disneyland with FH ; ) .... not that we NEEDED the money, it just felt good to do. I did put aside my wedding album for my daughters when they grow up. They can do with it as they please. I mean, really, what else are you supposed to do with that type of stuff?
DISbelief~
~You have to BE crazy to UNDERSTAND crazy!~ ; )
They didn't marry
It would make sense if it would have been rings from a marriage, but just an engagement that never fulfilled the promise?.... nahhhh
AWwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
I guess I missed that part. Then she should have given the ring back when they split up. Isn't that what you are supposed to do? I think I looked that up on the internet once, when my mom kept a ring from a man that proposed to her. It was a very pretty ring, but I thought she should have given it back when she kicked him to the curb.
It makes more sense now why you would be *upset* over this. I get ya~
DISbelief~
~You have to BE crazy to UNDERSTAND crazy!~ ; )
Nope, facts are facts and should you should stick to them.
Don't lie to the kid(s). Part of the duty of a parent is to teach trustworthiness and character to a kid. You can't base the entire premise of parenting on a lie.
IMHO of course.
My mom told me she and my
My mom told me she and my dad were on the verge of splitting up when she got pregnant with me. So I was an accident. I couldn't care less! I also wouldn't care if my parents ever loved each other or if it would have been a one night stand. I really DON'T get it when people say its important for kids to know their parents loved each other at one point. Why? Especially when they're not together anymore anyway. What does it really matter? Is it important to know how your parents felt about each person they were ever with? Or just because you happen to be a product of their relationship? If the kid was a result of a one night stand does that make their parents love them any less? I should hope not. I really don't think its important or the kids would even care unless they have some hope that their parents will get back together. Maybe I'm crazy but I really don't understand it. By the way Rags, I agree! 110%!!!
"Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There's too much fraternizing with the enemy"
well....
Melis... like everything in life, it depends on the person, every human is different. You may not feel affected by the fact that you were an "accident" but someone else might feel like the fact that he/she was an unplanned child is the end of the world, especially if the child "thought" the parents loved each other at one point.
And I don't think is right to lie to the kid, if they didn't love each other (the case of my DH and BM) why would they lie to SD and tell her that they were in love once... that I don't know... although she was technically planned from his part but not from BM's part. But the whole point here is that it DOES change the meaning of giving your child a ring that the other parent once gave you as a promise, because within a marriage, and years of being a family is different from just "living together" and "engaged" and not really in love, and actually separated when the child wasn't even 2 years old... so there is no memory of the parents together.