So BM must have received the letter on Monday morning as all day DH received non stop phone calls (he never speaks with her anymore) then he received a text to let him know SS would be coming for his Tuesday night sleepover. (obviously letter shook her up a bit). So when SS arrived last night he had a letter from BM to DH stating that she wishes she didnt have to send letters and that he would just talk to her but she is willing to be more reasonable and will allow DH more time with SS when he requests it in the future. Also she will not interfere with DH's phone calls with SS anymore.

So after blogging yesterday one of you lovely ladies gave me and DH some ammunition to fire back at BM. DH sent her a text that went like this:
'noted BM refused access on 10/10/13'.
Approx 1 hour later SS calls DH and is all 'I'm sick, (cough) I wanted to stay with mum (cough)'.

So the backlash of not asking BM to collect SS when he was sick this weekend (see previous blogs) is she's refusing visitation AGAIN. I know how very original of her lol. She sent a text to DH this morning that went like this:

'as per this weekend SS will not be there tonight for visitation. Thanks.'

Yep thanks BM we already anticipated the backlash and have DH's solicitor on speed dial. How dumb does she want to be?

Me and DH met during his divorce from BM (I started work for the same company he worked for). This however is not the way BM sees it, to her we were having an affair years before they actually split but I can honestly say my DH received his decree nisi before I started working with him so logically she just needs to do the math but as you will know BM's are never logical in their thinking.